Yamaha WR250R Mega Thread

Discussion in 'Thumpers' started by Sock Monkey, Apr 7, 2008.

  1. simmons1

    simmons1 Long timer

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2006
    Oddometer:
    1,753
    Location:
    Out Riding
    I did exactly that and the replacement pump failed in a few thousand miles. Put the original pump back in and it is working fine.
  2. Superstar

    Superstar Been here awhile

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2007
    Oddometer:
    507
    Location:
    Texas
    Any suggestions on these? The stock blinkers are atrocious and the replacements I find on eBay are all 2-wire (no running lights, blinker only). I'd like to keep all the OEM functionality in a smaller, better looking form factor.
  3. bxr140

    bxr140 Flame Bait

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2007
    Oddometer:
    1,041
    Location:
    On high
    Im not sure there are many aftermarket 3 wire options, but a closed relay (one where switching opens the circuit, as opposed to the more typical switched closed) on each side should do the job with a two wire signal.

    Alternatively, many (most?) motorcycles have three wires for the front signals. You might be able to find one you like from another brand.
  4. Caucasian

    Caucasian Adventurer

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2013
    Oddometer:
    28
    Location:
    So Cal
    Did you check these out
    http://www.soloracer.com/wr250xparts.html

    I've purchased a few things from this source and have been pleased with the vendor.
  5. BluePill

    BluePill AARP Slacker

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2008
    Oddometer:
    5,524
    Location:
    Pensacola on the Redneck Riviera
    Hey, if you're into looks - Why not be the first on your block to have Quad front lights. Two LED units on EACH SIDE - one for TS and one for running. The running set would be even brighter than stock.
  6. Reeksy

    Reeksy high state of hiatus

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2010
    Oddometer:
    1,228
    Location:
    Mt Mellum
    I'm looking to increase my range, 100 miles is fine when i'm on local trails, but for longer trips and commuting more fuel would be good.

    I'm considering the Safari tank, but I'm also wondering if anyone has tried a Nomad Tank.

    According to the owner tanks 3, 5 and 7 will fit the WRR.

    Cost isn't an issue, I like the idea of being able to remove the extra fuel capacity for short rides and add it again for longer rides, but how practicable are the nomad tanks?

    And would it annoy me taking up rack space on longer trips?
  7. rvsixer

    rvsixer Adventurer

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2013
    Oddometer:
    72
    Location:
    Orange County, CA
    True that.

    The solution I am using:
    Tank(s): http://rotopax.com/
    Rack (which comes predrilled to accept Rotopax tank mounts): http://www.ebay.com/itm/Yamaha-Wr25...Parts_Accessories&hash=item3f284ef0c3&vxp=mtr

    This combination allows carrying anywhere from zero to 1-3 extra gallons of fuel (or water or storage or combination thereof), AND not losing appreciable rack space. Conversion takes seconds. Assuming you can swing your leg over the lot :rofl.
  8. HardWorkingDog

    HardWorkingDog Harvey Mushman

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2009
    Oddometer:
    1,970
    Location:
    Walnut Crick, Cal.
    If cost isn't an issue, just get the Safari. You'll not notice the extra weight (if any) when riding trails, it adds protection to the radiator, and 3.7 gals is the sweet spot as far I'm concerned. And you'll still have rear luggage space.

    I really like my Safari tank.
  9. Reeksy

    Reeksy high state of hiatus

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2010
    Oddometer:
    1,228
    Location:
    Mt Mellum
    I thought about the rotopax, but that needs removing and pouring into the tank, whereas the advantage of the Nomad is it feeds into the fuel line... I know their marketing doesn't mention that for some reason... :patch:patch


  10. Reeksy

    Reeksy high state of hiatus

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2010
    Oddometer:
    1,228
    Location:
    Mt Mellum
    I've yet to hear anyone speak against it.

    Interestingly, the owner of the company has a WRR ... and loves it :clap
  11. DaymienRules

    DaymienRules Traffic target

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2008
    Oddometer:
    223
    Location:
    vancouver, bc
    I've never found pouring the rotopax into the tank to be a real issue. It's not like I the bike runs out of fuel before I need a break. The rotopax does, however, allow you to choose the size tank you want to carry, allow you to share that precious fuel with others that may also need it, still let you store stuff on top of the can, and costs about half of the Nomad. That said, my personal sweet spot has been the ims 3 gal, with the 1 or 2 gal rotopax when needed. I think it ended up being cheaper to buy the 3gal ims tank and 1 gal rotopax than just the larger ims or safari tank. All the benefits, minimal drawbacks.

    Also, check the vendors section, I believe forum members get 15% off the rotopax site.
  12. Reeksy

    Reeksy high state of hiatus

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2010
    Oddometer:
    1,228
    Location:
    Mt Mellum
    'Cos i'm already in Australia it works out cheaper to get the Safari than the IMS, and I have the Force rad guard which it's designed around.

    Currently I get three return trips to work on the standard tank (less if I take dirt detours :evil) and I pass two servos (gas stations) on the way. Using a rotopax to me is no different than stopping at the servo ... except I suppose I can stop in a different location. Plus in Australia I think the price of a rotopax and bracketry, plus a rack, is more than a Nomad.

    Granted, the rack would be something I'd purchase at some point anyway.
  13. DaymienRules

    DaymienRules Traffic target

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2008
    Oddometer:
    223
    Location:
    vancouver, bc
    Valid points on cost. I had the rotopax mounted on he back before I bought the ims. It worked, it was inexpensive, but i still ended up buying a bigger tank anyway. everything but a replacement tank was a fix, but not a solution. I'd bet that buying the nomad would still leave you wanting the safari. The nomad tanks look like they would certainly carry more fuel, but the design prevents any other use of that space.
  14. theMISSIONARY

    theMISSIONARY hunting and riding!!

    Joined:
    May 11, 2006
    Oddometer:
    2,334
    Location:
    Devonport Tazmania

    it was cheaper for me to get the IMS than the Safari :huh
  15. sequent

    sequent South Australia's own....

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2003
    Oddometer:
    480
    Location:
    Adelaide, Australia
    I've run a Nomad Tank No.1 on my WRR for the last two years (the one designed for XRs, TTRs etc). It fits fine behind the seat, although I had to add some foam (around 1cm thick) under the tank to ensure it had what I considered enough clearance between my FMF exhaust and the tank.

    [​IMG]

    I've just sold that tank and replaced it with a Nomad No.7 tank because the previous Nomad No.1 tank wouldn't fit with the Wolfman pannier racks. The No.7 tank sits higher, more "on the guard" than "over the guard" so-to-speak. It doesn't have the "wings" that hang down. It seems to fit well.

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    About the usage, I never bothered bolting it down, just used the two rubber straps to connect it and it never moved. I also didn't plumb it in (put a stopper on the outlet, and just removed and tipped it in when needed). The No.1 tanks was lower profile and you could just strap a bag down on top of it. The No.7 tank is sloped towards the seat, so I think any bag would slide forward to the rear of the seat, which may or may not be a problem...

    Dave.
  16. rsteiger

    rsteiger Bob

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2011
    Oddometer:
    370
    Location:
    Hotlanta Area
    If you go with LED type blinkers you can install the 12O'Clock Labs Turn Signal Running light adaptors. They take three wires in and give you two wires out. The turn signals will then be on like a parking light and flash when you use them as a turn signal

    http://shop.12oclocklabs.com/index.php?route=product/product&product_id=70
  17. rsteiger

    rsteiger Bob

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2011
    Oddometer:
    370
    Location:
    Hotlanta Area
    You might want to check and make sure that the tank will work with an FI system. I can see if gravity feeding a carb fuel line but the WRR is FI and the line coming out of the tank to the motor is under pressure.

    If you were going to have it feed the main tank instead you would have to punch a hole in the tank and add a fitting.
  18. byron555

    byron555 Lame Duck Adventurer

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2007
    Oddometer:
    1,142
    Location:
    Central Wisconsin
    I really like my 3.1 IMS, it is cheapest of the replacement tanks, uses stock shrouds (which I like) and the extra gallon is night and day for usability. The safari is really nice too, but more $$$ and of course .6 gallon more. I am not a big fan of the big IMS, it seems so wide... I prefer the 3.1 because 99.9% of the time it is enough fuel for me.
  19. rvsixer

    rvsixer Adventurer

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2013
    Oddometer:
    72
    Location:
    Orange County, CA
    I wonder how the Nomad plumbs into the FI system? The rotopax fill drill only takes a couple of minutes, and I need a stretch break every hour or two anyhow, so its really no big deal time or effort wise for me ymmv.

    Now if I was retired and could ride more than day/weekend trips, I'd just get the big Safari/IMS and be done with it. Everything else is just a range band aid at that point.
  20. sturgeon

    sturgeon Been here awhile

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2007
    Oddometer:
    975
    Location:
    Great White North
    3.1 IMS plus 0,1, or 2 Rotopax 1-gallon cans gives me more range than I've ever needed. About 500 km with both Rotopax cans mounted and filled. I use a Rotopax as soon as I figure there's enough room in the IMS to hold the extra 4 liters. The time to remove a Rotopax and pour it into the tank is minimal.