Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'GS Boxers' started by chef_of_the_future, Nov 4, 2016.
Not to inspiring if you own a wet head and the front end could fall out !
Not the smartest design by any stretch !
This is getting a little alarming
Well" this is all very comforting
It might be related to the crimping issue in this thread:
Went out and pulled my rubber sleeves down and mine look like they are fully seated.
What a crappy retention design. Will be watching all these threads closely.
This is seriously giving me second thoughts on moving forward with my purchase. Clearly where the upper fork tube meets the top casting is a poor design. Why not engineer a one piece solid upper tube with the the pivot joint attached, is the outer sleeve really necessary?
OK....on my way to the shop to check my tubes. They look perfectly fine - but so did the ones that Broke in 2
Looks like that was addressed in 2013.
That one was just for loose lower triple clamp screws...
That's not how I read it.
5. This recall involves the front fork. In rare cases, the locking bolt of the telelever fork may loosen at the upper end of the fork tube. Over time, if the bolt was not reinforced to prevent rotation, then it could be possible for the fork tube to loosen.
Ditto Low On Fuel.
Looks as though the first one I posted is just the actual recall notice and how the dealer was to take care of it rather than the notice of possible recall that was subsequently posted. I was just trying to let others know how the recall was handled and what the dealers service departments were supposed to do. I could have sworn there was another "loose triple clamp screws" scare somewhere along the way.
At least it looks like they are willing to stand behind their product...
The repair described in this bulletin is covered under warranty regardless of time or mileage. Reimbursement for this Recall Campaign is through normal claim entry tilizing the following information:
Defect Code: 00 00 31 29 00
Crimp-locking fixed fork tubes"
And they tell you where to measure if you believe you may have a problem.
OK that's scary. Will check mine as soon as I get home from work today.
I'm not a mechanical engineer but crimp-locking the upper fork tubes seems to be a poor design for an area of the bike under significant loading. I'd be interested to hear BMW's rationale for this type of design.
So how does that help the guy involved in post #8 of this thread?
Hopefully it gives him and his lawyer more ammo...
We have not heard back from the #8 poster what the outcome was - but it had to be better than a "tough shit - you broke our well engineered bike"
As an ME myself, I am not sure why a full circumference swage was not used to join the 2 parts.
BMW's lawyers will probably argue that the forks broke because of the accident and were not the cause of the accident. Could be hard to prove one way or the other.
But, who knows...
Well this sucks, as I am looking at buying a 2017 GSA ....