How big are ADV bikes going to get?

Discussion in 'The Perfect Line and Other Riding Myths' started by DesertPilot, Feb 8, 2019.

  1. slartidbartfast

    slartidbartfast Life is for good friends and great adventures Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2003
    Oddometer:
    10,530
    Location:
    Southern Louisiana or Southern England or ...
    KTM is already over 1300cc and other manufacturers are following suit.
    #21
    DesertPilot likes this.
  2. PeterTrocewicz

    PeterTrocewicz Been here awhile

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2009
    Oddometer:
    436
    Location:
    Kincardine Ontario
    I've been thinking about one of the big Adventure Bikes, ever since trying out ten GS 12 and the Tiger 12 a couple of years ago.
    To me they're not about off-roading. They're about comfortable 2-up touring without worrying about what kind of surface is under the wheels (including our legendary Ontario potholes), while having the power and handling to still be fun.
    My back has been blown out by a couple of accidents in my life, and I found the suspension and riding position of the Tiger particularly comfortable.
    #22
    Desce, neanderthal, Motor7 and 4 others like this.
  3. Tall Man

    Tall Man Priest, Temple of Syrinx

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2007
    Oddometer:
    5,903
    Location:
    The Occident
    Exactly correct, in my view.

    So many large "adventure" bikes seem to simply promise a comfortable touring experience, with the capability to go a bit farther afield than a Gold Wing or a Concours. The ergonomics on the ADV rigs are especially good for those of us who aren't short enough to be comfortable on/in the comparatively cramped rider triangles of motorcycles like the two I mention here.
    #23
    Ginger Beard and Desce like this.
  4. anotherguy

    anotherguy Long timer

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2009
    Oddometer:
    14,024
    Location:
    the hills
    I considered a BMW GS ending up buying another car 'cause the Jeep is getting real tired. I actually sold a motorcycle for the first time in decades so the space has opened for a new one. it'll be a year before I make up my mind. The FT120S Indian,New Tenere',a 650 dual sporter and a few others are in the mix. May even sell down to one or two bikes over the next year.
    #24
  5. advNZer?

    advNZer? Long timer

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2008
    Oddometer:
    3,568
    Location:
    Wellington,New Zealand
    the big adv bikes are really the new sport tourers that used to proliferate the market
    #25
    eakins, zuma and norseXL like this.
  6. DesertPilot

    DesertPilot Been here awhile

    Joined:
    May 18, 2014
    Oddometer:
    628
    Location:
    Mountain View, CA
    That's been my feeling as well, to which I add, "Don't think of them as 'off-road' bikes, think of them as 'any road' bikes." They fill this role very well. But there's an upper limit to how much weight I want to pick up when (not 'if', alas) I drop a bike while wrestling it down 'any road'.
    #26
  7. scrubb

    scrubb Master of Mayhem

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2010
    Oddometer:
    391
    Location:
    San Diego
    Isn’t that standard on the R1200GS’s? If not, delete your post and sell the IP to BMW! :roflThey’ll be pissed they didn’t think of it first!
    #27
  8. advNZer?

    advNZer? Long timer

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2008
    Oddometer:
    3,568
    Location:
    Wellington,New Zealand
    to be fair is a 1200 gs much heavier than an old r100gs?
    #28
    Desce likes this.
  9. AwDang

    AwDang Long timer

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2014
    Oddometer:
    2,099
    Location:
    121 miles from Tellico Plains
    Triumph got it right almost 10y ago! Good to see the market is finally catching on.
    #29
  10. Maggot12

    Maggot12 U'mmmm yeaah!!

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2010
    Oddometer:
    17,652
    Location:
    Canada's ocean playground
    When the Tenere first came out I rode my FJR1300 to the test ride.

    On my ride home I was thinking the FJR engine in the Super Tenere would be pretty sweet.

    So, yeah a 1300cc inline 4 Super, Super Tenere.
    May as well add the FJR's electric shield to the Tenere, to complete the package.
    #30
  11. Hamamelis

    Hamamelis Inmate

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2016
    Oddometer:
    143
    Location:
    RVA, Beast Coast
    An R100GS weighs about as much as a V-Strom 650!

    Edit: While I'm thinking of it, I think the real limit to ADV bike size is already about where the GSA (and most of its displacement class) is in terms of sheer bulk and top-heaviness. Some are better than others - even as a 25-year old with good legs, I find the Multistrada 1200s, KTM 1190/1290s, and Tiger 1200s can be tricky to just get off the kickstand! My favorite in that bunch might actually be the SuperTen, which did a masterful job on its mass placement while being much narrower than the 2012-era GSA it was designed to compete with, and so feels the most natural to get up and moving for me.
    #31
  12. bigdog99

    bigdog99 Weaned and neutered

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2004
    Oddometer:
    523
    Location:
    Grass Valley, CA
  13. BetterLateThanNever

    BetterLateThanNever Inactive User

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2014
    Oddometer:
    2,489
    Location:
    Ontario, Canada
    The talk in the industry is all about middleweights, now. I'd take this fresh crop of leviathans as a sign that we're reaching peak mass for ADV bikes, not that they're going to get indefinitely bigger.
    #33
    Ginger Beard and Motonirvana like this.
  14. JETalmage

    JETalmage Been here awhile

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2014
    Oddometer:
    741
    Egads! Somebody gets it.

    When are people going to get off all this derisive "it's too big and heavy for a dirt bike" nonsense? The adventure bike concept was never about building 1200cc dirt bikes. It is about large touring bikes built for greater real-world practicality than conventional-wisdom road bikes that seem to assume the whole world is pristine asphalt, with their 4 inches of suspension supporting ever-more-metal-just-for-metal's-sake.

    In other words, real-world practicality through modern, purposeful design in a bike to be used without obsessive finickiness over getting it dusty.

    In other other words; the same kind of down-to-earth practicality that has pretty much replaced tiny-wheeled curb scraping minivans with SUVs. Nobody calls SUV-driving soccer moms (or dads) "Starbucks posers" just because they don't go rock-crawling with them.

    It's just the practicality of functional ruggedness and surface-versatility over gratuitous spit-shine and glitz. That concept can be just as validly applied to bikes of any size. If there were a seriously ADV-configured version of a Gold Wing, that would in no way be antithetical to the original meaning and concept.

    A desire for, say, a 350cc twin "ADV bike" is fine and dandy for those who desire such a thing. But that in no way invalidates the concept applied to even larger displacement bikes. Those who think it does deserve to fall victim to their own logic:

    Your heart's desire is a 400 lb small twin "ADV bike" because it is ostensibly more genuinely "dirt worthy" than a 1200cc Adventure Bike, when much more powerful and off-road capable 700cc singles already exist weighing 75 lb less than that?

    Basically, it sounds like many are saying they want a twin version of the RE Himalayan; i.e., about the same level of trail capability, about the same weight, but with a higher-revving twin for (I assume) a little more road legs. And if that's what they want, fine. But there's no need to try to negate the validity of large displacement Adventure Bikes to justify it.

    JET
    #34
  15. DesertPilot

    DesertPilot Been here awhile

    Joined:
    May 18, 2014
    Oddometer:
    628
    Location:
    Mountain View, CA
    I quite agree. I bought my own modest adventure bike -- a svelte 460-lb Tiger 800 -- with the naive assumption I might take it offroad, and discovered that it's a near perfect machine for touring less-than-pristine roads, just as you say. But I still wonder of the 'bigger-is-better' mentality can be carried too far. Surely there's an upper limit. Surely Triumph will never produce the machine I photoshopped in the original post, much though I'd love to see one :D

    What is that limit? Is there some upper weight or engine size beyond which the 'go-anywhere' bike becomes an "I'm not sure I'd want to take that there" bike? ANd have we reached it?
    #35
  16. ShOqUePoT

    ShOqUePoT GS Pot

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2009
    Oddometer:
    4,475
    Location:
    The VT of MA
    I hear Boss Hoss has something in the works...
    #36
    cyclopathic, Jabcon2 and Motonirvana like this.
  17. slartidbartfast

    slartidbartfast Life is for good friends and great adventures Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2003
    Oddometer:
    10,530
    Location:
    Southern Louisiana or Southern England or ...
    Riding one of those monsters more than a few miles, in anything other than a straight line and on anything other than perfect pavement is quite an adventure - so maybe they already qualify.
    #37
    ShOqUePoT likes this.
  18. DR Donk

    DR Donk Been here awhile

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2009
    Oddometer:
    770
    Location:
    Western Michigan
    I'm with you on this bike. I am hoping it is under $10,000.
    #38
    Motonirvana likes this.
  19. eakins

    eakins Butler Maps

    Joined:
    May 29, 2002
    Oddometer:
    32,482
    Location:
    Fort Collins, Colorado
    And in the end that's how most are used, upright fast street bikes.
    #39
  20. diegosaenz

    diegosaenz Been here awhile

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2011
    Oddometer:
    735
    Location:
    The Flatwest, Chicago
    Ideally smaller but just as powerful. The 701 tickles all my whistles but I need to slab to get anywhere from Chicago.
    #40