I've read countless threads about Garmins, and the Moto G, and still struggling with the decision. Background: I'm currently riding 90% back country roads looking for dirt or gravel in NorthWest VA near the BRP. Hope to expand that to multi states in the future. I'd like to have a GPS with a nice size screen mounted above the speedo. I don't need a lot of fancy options, just need to know which road I'm on and where I am on that road. My ideal budget is about $400. Options: Moto G with 16G for $219 and a mount for about $90. or . . . The Garmin 660LM for $325 and about $90 for a mount. I can stretch for the 665 if it's that much better, but a little out of my price range. I like the Moto G as I really just want a basic GPS that's low maintenance. Internal battery means no wiring. I have an iPhone 5 for POI and anything else I need cell service for. The iPhone screen is just too small to navigate with. I like the screen size and price point of the Moto G. My concern is it seems like not a lot of you are going this way and I'm just wondering why. Question for the experts - has anyone used the Moto G or another large screen smart phone and not been satisfied, then gone to a Garmin? Appreciate any feedback on pros and cons of both. Or, can you send me a link to another thread if you've already answered this question.